Medina County Courthouse

Thursday, February 04, 2010

Ohio Supreme Court Decision: Supreme Court Rules Prosecutor’s Conduct Did Not Violate Disciplinary Rules

Supreme Court Rules Prosecutor’s Conduct Did Not Violate Disciplinary Rules

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kellogg-Martin, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-282.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 07-069. The complaint against Kimberly J. Kellogg-Martin, Attorney Registration No. 0022083, is dismissed.
Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., dissents and would impose a 12-month suspension with six months stayed.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-282.pdf

(Feb. 4, 2010) The Supreme Court of Ohio today dismissed a disciplinary complaint alleging professional misconduct by Logan County assistant prosecutor Kimberly Kellogg-Martin. The Court’s decision reversed findings of disciplinary rule violations by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances & Discipline.

In a 6-1 per curiam opinion, the Court concluded that Kellogg-Martin’s acts and omissions in not disclosing the contents of two documents to the defendant in a juvenile rape case did not violate her legal obligations as a prosecutor or her ethical duties as an attorney. The undisclosed documents were reports summarizing the victim’s statements about the crime during interviews with a social worker and a sheriff’s deputy.

The majority opinion was joined by Justices Paul E. Pfeifer, Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, Maureen O’Connor, Terrence O’Donnell, Judith Ann Lanzinger and Robert R. Cupp.

Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer entered a dissent stating that in his view the majority erred by evaluating Kellogg-Martin’s conduct in light of the state’s rules of criminal procedure and court decisions defining defendants’ due process rights, rather than applying the more rigorous disclosure standard set by Rule 7-103(B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The Chief Justice wrote that he would affirm the rule violations found by the disciplinary board and impose the board’s recommended sanction of a 12-month license suspension with six months stayed on conditions.

Contacts
Jonathan E. Coughlan, 614.461.0256, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Christopher J. Weber, 614.462.5400, for Kimberly Kellogg-Martin.

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

No comments: